Archive

Archive for April 21, 2010

Pomplamoose: Refreshingly Cool

April 21, 2010 Leave a comment

Before starting to write about the title, I want to confess.

My peak productivity (in writing blog post, article, and basically anything to write) is when I feel a great urge to throw my tantrums, a.k.a. really angry.

Take a conclusion.

-

-

I’ve been listening much to Lady Gaga for the last two months. I like the way she dresses up: unorthodox, eye catching, and definitely fashion-maker. Awesome. And though many people said she is a bad singer, or weird; hey, I like her songs anyway.

And that’s the story, I opened YouTube, searched for ‘Lady Gaga Telephone’ when this amazing video came up in the list. Listen first:

How did that sound? Cool eh?

-

Pomplamoose, so they called themselves. They are Jack Conte and Nataly Dawn, and they are AWESOME. Yes, capitals. I don’t know much about them, and I won’t tell you who they are; but I’m going to tell you what I like from them.

First of all, I do like both of the Lady Gaga version of Telephone and the Pomplamoose cover.  The latter is so-not Lady Gaga, but I absorbed easily, and I like it! Kind of listening to Owl City. The mix of the music instrument, the distinguished voice, and how they create a totally different soul for the song! (I have to admit, Lady Gaga gave a very bold trademark of herself in all of her songs).

Second thing, I feel the honesty. I mean, when you see their video, you definitely can see the music instrument playing and also listen to its sound. You got my point? I mean, there’s no hidden sounds, or synthesizer, or sound effect, whatever. It is just soooo honest.

And then, they have their own style in singing a song. I don’t know to say that in exact details, since I don’t know much about music; but when you listen to them you’ll know it’s Pomplamoose.

Check this out!

-

And how they turned this classic song into a freshly delicate music!

Categories: Music Tags:

Sherlock Holmes the Movie: ‘Iron-Man’ly Pictured

April 21, 2010 1 comment

Sorry for the loooong delay folks. Have been busy lately.

Okay. Out of date? Who cares anyway. I’m just telling you my opinion about this, so let us have some facts first.

-

Fact #1: I like Agatha Christie’s better than Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s.

Sorry Sir, no offense. It is just because I read more Hercule Poirot cases than Sherlock’s.

Fact #2: Sherlock Holmes is the most famous fictional detective character.

Ah yes. No doubt everyone was wondering how he would be pictured on screen.

Fact #3: Robert Downey Jr. and Guy Ritchie are famous.

I expected great movie from them, surely.

-

-

Then when finally I watched the movie, I have these following points in mind:

Point #1: I didn’t know the story.

Oh well, as I said, I am not really a Sherlock fan, and I couldn’t recall which story this movie depicted. The plot was some kind of cases-mixing. Probably. Because there was Irene Adler (best known in A Scandal in Bohemia), Watson’s gambling problem I’ve read in The Adventure of the Dancing Men. So I wasn’t pretty sure this movie was referencing to which case as its base storyline.

Point #2: Where’s the famous hat and pipe and accessories?

Silly me. I imagined that Sherlock Holmes would be pretty much like the novel’s description. Hat, pipe, magnifying glass, coat. And where the hell were all of those things? I saw a hot muscular guy with I-don’t-give-a-damn-care attitude with his always-rolling eyes (ah yeah, do you guys see how Sherlock Holmes in the movie barely see people’s eyes when talking to them?). So Tony-Stark (the attitude, see?).

Point #3: Is Sherlock really good at fight?

I don’t know for sure, that’s why I am asking. Because it was like deja vu. Like watching Iron Man, really. I have no idea why I’m thinking like that, is it because the image of Robert Downey, Jr. or is it really because Sherlock was pictured like that? Both are true, probably.

Point #4: I felt like reading a book.

There were a lot flash-backing scene in the movie, particularly when explaining the tricks Sherlock planned or did. Detailed, and in some part I felt they were unnecessary. How he could escape by throwing himself to the river, and so on. It was just like I read a book, or someone read a book for me; like I was imagining the whole story, regardless I was truly watching and not imagining.

-

-

Oh well, why I give that title is merely because I can’t keep my brain to think that Robert Downey, Jr. is Iron Man. And yet in Sherlock Holmes the Movie, more or less, Sherlock was just like Tony Stark.

That’s all I guess. I am tired :)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.